2001 Program

Fourth International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication

JAMA and the BMJ Publishing Group welcome you to Barcelona and the Fourth International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication. This Congress follows the 3 highly successful International Congresses on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication held in 1989 and 1993 in Chicago and in 1997 in Prague. The program appears below. As before, we will have 3 days for presentations from the podium, including 41 presentations of new research into peer review and all aspects of scientific publication. Each of these presentations will be followed by equal time for discussion and questions from the audience. In addition, there are 65 poster presentations scheduled for Saturday and Sunday. We hope you will take an active part in the program as we depend on you to make this Congress even more successful than the previous 3 Congresses. We wish to thank Ediciones Doyma for assistance with local arrangements as well as the Congress sponsors, exhibitors, and advertisers. Enjoy the Congress and enjoy Barcelona!

Drummond Rennie, Congress Director
Annette Flanagin, Congress Coordinator
Richard Smith, European Director
Jane Smith, European Coordinator
Evarist Feliu, Local Arrangements Coordinator

Special thanks to our
Sponsors
Exhibitors
Congress organizers and planners

Detailed Program: September 14-16, 2001

Friday, September 14

Welcome and Introductions
Drummond Rennie (UNITED STATES)

New Research on Authorship and Contributorship
Moderator: Drummond Rennie (UNITED STATES)

A Multi-Journal Authorship Database: Variation in Author Contributions by Byline Position
Christine Laine, Anthony Proto, Frank Davidoff (UNITED STATES)
Abstract

Authors Define Their Own Contribution to Articles: Who Fulfills the Criteria for Authorship?
Lydia E Vos, A John P M Overbeke (THE NETHERLANDS)
Abstract

What Makes an Author? A Comparison Between What Authors Say They Did and What Editorial Guidelines Require
Susan van Rooyen, Sandra Goldbeck-Wood, Fiona Godlee (UNITED STATES, UNITED KINGDOM)
Abstract

Survey of Contributorship in Cochrane Reviews
Graham Mowatt, Jeremy M Grimshaw, on behalf of the Survey of Contributorship in Cochrane Reviews Project Team (SCOTLAND, UNITED KINGDOM)
Abstract  |   Article  published in JAMA. 2002;287(21):2769-2771. doi:10.1001/jama.287.21.2769.

More Research on Authorship and Contributorship
Moderator: Evarist Feliu (SPAIN)

Corporate Authorship: Problems With Current Systems for Indexing and Citation
Kay Dickersin, Roberta Scherer, Michelle Gil-Montero (UNITED STATES)
Abstract  |   Article  published in JAMA. 2002;287(21):2772-2774. doi:10.1001/jama.287.21.2772.

The Hidden Research Paper: Evidence of Suppressed Opinion, Censored Criticism, and Serious Bias Among Contributors
Richard Horton (UNITED KINGDOM)
Abstract  |   Article  published in JAMA. 2002;287(21):2775-2778. doi:10.1001/jama.287.21.2775.

Quality Issues and Standards for Published Material
Moderator: John Bailar (UNITED STATES)

Is the Reporting Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials an Adequate Measure of Their Methodological Quality?
Karin Huwiler, Peter Jüni, Matthias Egger, Christoph Junker (SWITZERLAND, UNITED KINGDOM)
Abstract  |   Article  published in JAMA. 2002;287(21):2801-2804. doi:10.1001/jama.287.21.2801.

Misleading Publications of Major Mammography Screening Trials in Major General Medical Journals
Peter C Gøtzsche, Ole Olsen (DENMARK)
Abstract

Quality Issues and Standards for Published Material (Continued)
Moderator: Liselotte Hojgaard (DENMARK)

Discussing Trials in Context: The Balkanization of Research Results
Phil Alderson, Mike Clarke, Iain Chalmers (UNITED KINGDOM)
Abstract  |   Article  published in JAMA. 2002;287(21):2799-2801. doi:10.1001/jama.287.21.2799.

Reporting Number Needed to Treat and Number Needed to Harm in Randomized Controlled Trials
Denise Chang, Joy Melnikow, Jim Nuovo (UNITED STATES)
Abstract  |   Article  published in JAMA. 2002;287(21):2813-2814. doi:10.1001/jama.287.21.2813.

Extrapolation of Association Between Two Variables in Four General Medical Journals
Yen-Hong Kuo (UNITED STATES)
Abstract  |   Article  published in JAMA. 2002;287(21):2815-2817. doi:10.1001/jama.287.21.2815.

The Nature of Statistical Input Into Medical Research
Douglas G Altman, Steven N Goodman, Sara Schroter (UNITED KINGDOM, UNITED STATES)
Abstract

Quality Issues and Standards for Published Material (Continued)
Moderator: Frank Davidoff (UNITED STATES)

Association of Journal Quality Indicators With Methodological Quality of Clinical Research Articles
Kirby Lee, Marieka Schotland, Lisa A Bero (UNITED STATES)
Abstract  |   Article  published in JAMA. 2002;287(21):2805-2808. doi:10.1001/jama.287.21.2805.

Quality of Systematic Reviews of Economic Evaluations in Health Care and What They Are Telling Us
Vittorio Demicheli, Tom Jefferson (ITALY, UNITED KINGDOM)
Abstract  |   Article  published in JAMA. 2002;287(21):2809-2812. doi:10.1001/jama.287.21.2809.

Graphics in Journal Pharmaceutical Advertisements: Are They Truthful and Are They Adequately Detailed?
Richelle J Cooper, David L Schriger, Roger C Wallace, Vladislav J Mikulich, Michael S Wilkes (UNITED STATES)
Abstract

Published Peer Review Policies: Determining Journal Peer Review Status From a Non-Expert Perspective
Marieka Schotland, Erin VanScoyoc, Lisa A Bero (UNITED STATES)
Abstract

Saturday, September 15

Quality and Inequality in Research, Peer Review, and Publications
Douglas G Altman (UNITED KINGDOM)

Research on Peer Review
Moderator: A John P M Overbeke (THE NETHERLANDS)

Effect of Written Feedback on Quality of Reviews: Two Randomized Trials
Michael L Callaham, E John Gallagher, Robert K Knopp (UNITED STATES)
Abstract  |   Article  published in JAMA. 2002;287(21):2781-2783. doi:10.1001/jama.287.21.2781.

Peer Reviewer Opinions About Manuscript-Specific Acknowledgment
Michael Berkwits, Frank Davidoff (UNITED STATES)
Abstract

Peer Review in Small and Big Medical Journals
Ana Marusic, Ivan Kresimir Lukic, Matko Marusic, David McNamee, David Sharp, Richard Horton (CROATIA, UNITED KINGDOM)
Abstract  |   Article  published in Croat Med J. 2002;43(3):286-289.

Research on Peer Review (Continued)
Moderator: Lisa A Bero (UNITED STATES)

Effect of Statistical Review on Manuscript Quality in Medicina Clínica
Catalina Arnau, Erik Cobo, Francesc Cardellach, Joseph Maria Ribera, Albert Selva, Agustin Urrutia, Vincente Fonollosa, Celestino Rey-Joly, Miquel Vilardell, J Lluís Segú (SPAIN)
Abstract

Editorial Peer Review for Improving the Quality of Reports of Biomedical Studies: A Cochrane Review
Phil A Alderson, Frank Davidoff, Tom Jefferson, Elizabeth Wager (UNITED KINGDOM, UNITED STATES, ITALY)
Abstract  |   Article  published in JAMA. 2002;287(21):2784-2786. doi:10.1001/jama.287.21.2784.

Measuring the Quality of Editorial Peer Review
Tom Jefferson, Elizabeth Wager, Frank Davidoff (ITALY, UNITED KINGDOM, UNITED STATES)
Abstract  |   Article  published in JAMA. 2002;287(21):2786-2790. doi:10.1001/jama.287.21.2786.

Communicating to Readers
Moderator: Roy Pitkin (UNITED STATES)

Paper or Screen, Mother Tongue or English: Which Is Better?
Pål Gulbrandsen, Torben V Schroeder, Josef Milerad, Magne Nylenna
(NORWAY, DENMARK, SWEDEN)
Abstract  |   Article  published in JAMA. 2002;287(21):2851-2853. doi:10.1001/jama.287.21.2851.

Comparing the Quality of Review Articles Published in Peer-Reviewed and Throwaway Journals: Should We Be Throwing Away the Throwaways?
Paula A Rochon, Lisa A Bero, Ari M Bay, Jennifer L Gold, Julie M Dergal, Malcolm A Binns, David L Streiner, Jerry H Gurwitz (UNITED STATES, CANADA)
Abstract  |   Article  published in JAMA. 2002;287(21):2853-2856. doi:10.1001/jama.287.21.2853.

Media Coverage of Scientific Meetings: Too Much, Too Soon?
Lisa M Schwartz, L Baczek, Steven Woloshin (UNITED STATES)
Abstract  |   Article  published in JAMA. 2002;287(21):2859-2863. doi:10.1001/jama.287.21.2859.

Research on e-Journals and Online Information
Moderator: George D Lundberg (UNITED STATES)

Comparison of Editorial Peer Review Practices Among Indexed Health Sciences Electronic Journals
Ann C Weller (UNITED STATES)
Abstract  |   Article  published in JAMA. 2002;287(21):2865-2866. doi:10.1001/jama.287.21.2865.

How Aware Are Health Professionals and Consumers of Resources to Find Peer-Reviewed Evidence on the Internet?
Christopher Sigouin, Alejandro R Jadad (CANADA)
Abstract  |   Article  published in JAMA. 2002;287(21):2867-2869. doi:10.1001/jama.287.21.2867.

Much Ado About "Nothing"? Looking for Evidence on Harm Resulting From Health Information on the Internet
Anthony George Crocco, Miguel Villasis-Keever, Alejandro R Jadad
(CANADA, MEXICO)
Abstract  |   Article  published in JAMA. 2002;287(21):2869-2871. doi:10.1001/jama.287.21.2869.

Sunday, September 16

Making Peer Reviewers Visible: Openness, Accountability, and Credit
Fiona Godlee (UNITED KINGDOM)

Publication Bias
Moderator: Magne Nylenna (NORWAY)

Publishing Protocols Electronically: A Way to Reduce or Introduce Bias?
Chris A Silagy, Phillipa Middleton, Sally Hopewell (AUSTRALIA, UNITED KINGDOM)
Abstract  |   Article  published in JAMA. 2002;287(21):2831-2834. doi:10.1001/jama.287.21.2831.

Publication Bias in Editorial Decision Making: Assessment of Reports of Controlled Trials Submitted to JAMA
Carin M Olson, Drummond Rennie, Deborah Cook, Kay Dickersin, Annette Flanagin, Joseph W Hogan, Qi Zhu, Jennifer Reiling, Brian Pace (UNITED STATES, CANADA)
Abstract  |   Article  published in JAMA. 2002;287(21):2825-2828. doi:10.1001/jama.287.21.2825.

Speed of Publication for Submitted Manuscripts by Direction of Study Results
Carin M Olson, Drummond Rennie, Deborah Cook, Kay Dickersin, Annette Flanagin, Qi Zhu, Jennifer Reiling, Brian Pace(UNITED STATES, CANADA)
Abstract  |   Article  published in JAMA. 2002;287(21):2829-2831. doi:10.1001/jama.287.21.2829.

Grant Review, Ethical Approval of Published Research, Financial Interests, and Funding Support
Moderator: Catherine D DeAngelis (UNITED STATES)

Of Molecules, Mice, and Men: Relationship of Biological Complexity of Research Model to Final Rating in the Grant Peer Review Process of the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
Mark Taylor (CANADA)
Abstract

Reporting of Ethics Committee Approval and Informed Consent in Clinical Trials: Have Journals Improved?
Veronica Yank, Drummond Rennie (UNITED STATES)
Abstract  |   Article  published in JAMA. 2002;287(21):2835-2838. doi:10.1001/jama.287.21.2835.

Benefits of Financial Disclosure in Published Trials: Absence of Associations Between Funding Source, Trial Outcome, and Quality Score
Tammy J Clifford, David Moher, Nicholas Barrowman (CANADA)
Abstract  |   Article  published in BMC Health Serv Res. 2002;2:18. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-2-18.

Financial Conflict of Interest and Industry Support in Published Research in Biomedical Journals: A Study of Research Outcomes and Adherence to the Uniform Requirements
Anu R Gupta, Cary P Gross, Harlan M Krumholz (UNITED STATES)
Abstract  |   Article  published in BMJ. 2003;326:526. doi: dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.326.7388.526.

Editorial Independence, Confidentiality in Peer Review, and Publication Ethics
Moderator: Daniel J Ncayiyana (SOUTH AFRICA)

Editorial Independence at Medical Journals Owned by Professional Associations: A Survey of Editors
Ronald M Davis, Marcus Müllner (UNITED STATES, AUSTRIA)
Abstract  |   Article  published in Sci Eng Ethics. 2002:8(4):513-528.

Confidentiality of Manuscripts Submitted to Medical Journals for Peer Review: Legal Lessons From an Ongoing Case
Debra Parrish, David Bruns (UNITED STATES)
Abstract  |   Article  published in JAMA. 2002;287(21):2839-2841. doi:10.1001/jama.287.21.2839.

Work of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
Mike Farthing, Richard Horton, Richard Smith, Alex Williamson (UNITED KINGDOM)
Abstract

Postpublication Issues
Moderator: Richard Smith (UNITED KINGDOM)

Positive Outcome and Other Characteristics Predicting Citation by Other Authors of a Cohort of Original Research Papers in Peer-Reviewed Journals
Michael L Callaham, Robert L Wears, Ellen J Weber (UNITED STATES)
Abstract  |   Article  published in JAMA. 2002;287(21):2847-2850. doi:10.1001/jama.287.21.2847.

How Important Is the Size of a Reprint Order?
Sally Hopewell, Mike Clarke (UNITED KINGDOM)
Abstract  |   Article  published in JAMA. 2002;287(21):2847-2850. doi:10.1001/jama.287.21.2847.

The Correspondence Column: How Important Is Post-Publication Criticism in Shaping Clinical Knowledge?
Richard Horton (UNITED KINGDOM)
Abstract  |   Article  published in JAMA. 2002;287(21):2843-2847. doi:10.1001/jama.287.21.2843.

POSTER LISTINGS

Saturday, September 15

Authorship and Contributorship

Equity and Accountability: Successful Use of the Contributorship Concept in a Multi-site Study
E Beth Devine, Johnny Beney, Lisa A Bero (UNITED STATES, SWITZERLAND)
Abstract

Authorship Criteria Among Cuban Biomedical Professionals
Guillermo J Padrón, Jorge Bacallao (CUBA)
Abstract

Authorship of Medical Papers in Three Chinese Medical Journals
Li Wenhui, Qian Shouchu, Qian Yue (CHINA)
Abstract

Communicating to Readers

Changes in Stage of Learning Associated With Participation in a Journal-Based Continuing Medical Education Activity
Thomas B Cole, Richard M Glass (UNITED STATES)
Abstract  |   Article  published in J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2004;24(4):205-212.

Press Releases: Translating Research Into News
Lisa M Schwartz, Steven Woloshin (UNITED STATES)
Abstract  |   Article  published in JAMA. 2002;287(21):2856-2858. doi:10.1001/jama.287.21.2856.

Editorial Process

The Meta-edit: When Is Copyediting Peer Review?
Jane C Lantz (UNITED STATES)
Abstract

Changes in Manuscripts and Quality: The Contribution of Peer Review
Gretchen P Purcell, Shannon L Donovan, Frank Davidoff (UNITED STATES)
Abstract

Technical Editing of Research Reports in Biomedical Journals
Elizabeth Wager, Philippa Middleton, the Peer Review and Technical Editing Systematic Review (PIRATES) Group (UNITED KINGDOM, AUSTRALIA)
Abstract  |   Article  published in JAMA. 2002;287(21):2821-2824. doi:10.1001/jama.287.21.2821.

Peer Review of Grants

Characteristics of Successfully Recruited Grant Application Peer Reviewers
William C Grace, Teresa Levitin, Susan Coyle (UNITED STATES)
Abstract

Proposal Review Scores as Predictors of Project Performance
Karunesh Tuli, Alan Sorkin (UNITED STATES)
Abstract

Quality Issues and Standards

Factors Associated With the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials Examining Brain Injury
Chisa Yamada, Mark K Borsody (UNITED STATES)
Abstract

An Evaluation of the Graphical Literacy of JAMA: Implications for Peer Review
Richelle J Cooper, David L Schriger, Reb J H Close (UNITED STATES)
Abstract  |   Article  published in Ann Emerg Med. 2002;40(3):317–322. doi:dx.doi.org/10.1067/mem.2002.127327.

Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies on Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Statement
Jeroen G Lijmer, Hans R Reitsma, Afina S Glas, Patrick M M Bossuyt, for the STARD Group (THE NETHERLANDS)
Abstract  |   Article  published in Clin Chem. 2003;49(1):1-6. doi: 10.1373/49.1.1.

Appointment of Statistical Editor and Quality of Statistics in a Small Medical Journal
Ivan Kresimir Lukic, Ana Marusic, Matko Marusic (CROATIA)
Abstract  |   Article  published in Croat Med J. 2001;42(5):500-503.

Effect of Dedicated Methodology/Statistical Review on Published Manuscript Quality
David L Schriger, Richelle J Cooper, Robert L Wears, Joseph F Waeckerle (UNITED STATES)
Abstract  |   Article  published in Ann Emerg Med. 2002;40(3):334–337. doi: dx.doi.org/10.1067/mem.2002.127328.

Review of Reference Inaccuracies
Lee Ann Riesenberg, Srinvas Dontineni (UNITED STATES)
Abstract

Content Categorization for a Peer-Reviewed Journal
David Newman, Bin Zou, Judith Tintinalli (UNITED STATES)
Abstract

Research on Abstracts

Revisited: Full Publication of Results Initially Presented in Abstracts
Roberta Scherer, Patricia Langenberg (UNITED STATES)
Abstract

Data Inconsistencies in Abstracts of Research Articles in the New Zealand Medical Journal
Robert Siebers (NEW ZEALAND)
Abstract  |   Article  published in N Z Med J. 2002;115(1147):57-8.

Fate of Abstracts Presented at Biomedical Meetings: A Systematic Review
Björn Erik von Elm, Greta Poglia, Bernhard Walder, Martin R Tramèr (SWITZERLAND)
Abstract  |   Article  published in BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003;3:12. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-3-12.

Study of Peer Review

Identifying Manuscript Reviewers: Ask First or Just Send?
Leon F Burmeister, Roy M Pitkin (UNITED STATES)
Abstract  |   Article  published in JAMA. 2002;287(21):2795-2796. doi:10.1001/jama.287.21.2795.

Journal Manuscript Peer Review: Research and Controversies
Charles F Curran (UNITED STATES)
Abstract

Reviewing Peer Reviews: The Experience of a Public Health Journal
Ana M Garcia, Toni Plasencia, Esteve Fernandez (SPAIN)
Abstract

Peer Review: Are There Other Ways?
Philippa Middleton, Mike Clarke, Phil Alderson, Iain Chalmers (AUSTRALIA, UNITED KINGDOM)
Abstract

A Comparison of the Performance of Foreign and Native Peer Reviewers in a Brazilian Journal
Hooman Momen (SWITZERLAND)
Abstract

Unblinding by Authors: Incidence and Nature at Two Medical Journals With Double-Blinded Peer Review Policies
William W Olmsted, Anthony V Proto, Douglas S Katz (UNITED STATES)
Abstract  |   Article  published in Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179(6)1415-1417.

Comparing Author Satisfaction With Signed and Unsigned Reviews
Maeve Rooney, Elizabeth Walsh, Louis Appleby, Greg Wilkinson (IRELAND, UNITED KINGDOM)
Abstract

Double-Blind and Single-Blind Peer Review: A Comparison of Their Quality
Sui Xingfang, Ren Xiaoli, Xue Aihua (CHINA)
Abstract

Ideas and Assumptions of Peer Review Research: A Short Review
Sven Trelle (GERMANY)
Abstract

Measuring the Quality of Peer Review in the Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor Geneeskunde (Dutch Journal of Medicine): Development and Testing of a New Instrument
Roos A A van Duursen, Peter Hart, A John P M Overbeke (THE NETHERLANDS)
Abstract

Is There an Association Between Author Satisfaction With Peer Review and the Quality of Reviews?
Ellen J Weber, Michael L Callaham, Joseph F Waeckerle, Patricia P Katz (UNITED STATES)
Abstract  |   Article  published in JAMA. 2002;287(21):2790-2793. doi:10.1001/jama.287.21.2790.

Peer Review of Continuing Professional Development in Medical Journals: Desirable Yes, But Feasible?
Erica Weir, John Hoey, Harvey Skinner, Dave Davis, Brian Gibson (CANADA, UNITED STATES)
Abstract

Sunday, September 16

Authorship and Contributorship

Authorship in a Medical Journal From a Developing Country
Humberto Reyes, Marcela Jacard, Viviana Herskovic (CHILE)
Abstract  |   Article  published in Rev Med Chil. 2002;130(12):1391-8.

What Makes an Author? The Views of Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and Readers
Susan van Rooyen, Sandra Goldbeck-Wood, Fiona Godlee (UNITED KINGDOM)
Abstract

Communicating to Readers

Towards Improving the Study of the Usability of Electronic Forms of Scientific Information
Philippa Jane Benson (UNITED STATES)
Abstract

Importance of Letters to the Editor in the Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor Geneeskunde (Dutch Journal of Medicine)
Shalindra Mahesh, Martin Kabos, Henk C Walvoort, A John P M Overbeke (THE NETHERLANDS)
Abstract  |   Article  published in Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2001;145:531-5.

What Is Newsworthy? A Comparison of Reporting of Medical Research in British Tabloid and Broadsheet Newspapers
Christopher Bartlett, Jonathan Sterne, Matthias Egger (UNITED KINGDOM)
Abstract  |   Article  published in BMJ. 2002;325:81. doi: dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.325.7355.81.

Ethical Issues

Guidelines for Good Publication Practice: The COPE Experience
Richard Horton (UNITED KINGDOM)
Abstract

Informed Consent in Clinical Trials: Survey of Five Chinese Medical Journals
Wang Mouyou (CHINA)
Abstract

Publication Bias

Effects of Reviewers' Gender on Assessments of a Gender-Related Standardized Manuscript
Addeane S Caelleigh, Mohammedreza Hojat, Ann Steinecke, Joseph S Gonella (UNITED STATES)
Abstract  |   Article  published in Teach Learn Med. 2003;15(3):163-167. doi: 10.1207/S15328015TLM1503_03.

Influence of Impact Factors on Scientific Publication
Eileen Healy, Michael N Hart (UNITED STATES)
Abstract

Evidence of Journal Bias Against Complementary and Alternative Medicine
David Moher, Terry Klassen, Margaret Lawson (CANADA)
Abstract  |   Article  published in J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58(8):763–768.

Effect of Industry Funding on Manuscript Quality
Carin M Olson, Drummond Rennie, Deborah Cook, Mary Mickel, Kay Dickersin, Annette Flanagin, Qi Zhu, Jennifer Reiling, Brian Pace (UNITED STATES, CANADA)
Abstract

Quality Issues and Standards

Relationship Between Manner of Presentation of Illustrations During the Peer Review Process and the Number of Evaluative Responses
Judith A McKay (UNITED STATES)
Abstract

What Is the Quality of the Economic Information Provided in Promotional Material for Family Practitioners? The Case of Proton Pump Inhibitors in the United Kingdom
Vittorio Demicheli, Tom Jefferson (ITALY, UNITED KINGDOM)
Abstract

Questionable Diagnostic Experiment Design in Laboratory Medicine Publications and Recommendations for Improvement
Yan Zang, Qin Xiaoguang (CHINA)
Abstract

Use of Dedicated Methods/Statistical Reviewers for Peer Review: A Content Analysis of Comments to Authors Made by Methods and Regular Reviewers
Frank C Day, David L Schriger, Christopher Todd, Robert L Wears (UNITED STATES)
Abstract  |   Article  published in Ann Emerg Med. 2002;40(3):329–333. doi: dx.doi.org/10.1067/mem.2002.127326.

Reference Accuracy in Peer-Reviewed Journals: A Systematic Review
Elizabeth Wager, Philippa Middleton, the Peer Review and Technical Editing Systematic Review (PIRATES) Group (UNITED KINGDOM, AUSTRALIA)
Abstract  |   Article  published in Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 8 OCT 2008. doi:10.1002/14651858.MR000002.pub3.

Effects of Published Errata on Subsequent Publications
MaryEllen Sievert, John M Budd, Gabriel Peterson, Kui Chun Su (UNITED STATES)
Abstract

Study of Manuscript Submission and Publishing

Medical Journal Publishing: One Culture or Several?
Tim Albert, Alex Williamson (UNITED KINGDOM)
Abstract  |   Article  published in Learned Publishing. 2002;15(4):291-296(6).

Manuscript Submissions and US Representation at Medical Journals in an Era of Health System Reform: An Analysis of Trends, 1994-1998
Michael Berkwits, Warren A Bilker, Frank Davidoff (UNITED STATES)
Abstract

The Influence of War on Publishing in Peer-Reviewed Journals
Rajko Igic (UNITED STATES)
Abstract  |   Article  published in Scientometrics. 2002;53(3):447-452.

Where Are the High-Quality, Clinically Relevant Studies Published?
K Ann McKibbon, Nancy L Wilczynski, R Brian Haynes (CANADA)
Abstract  |   Article  published in BMC Med. 2004;2:33. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-2-33.

The Coverage of Women's Health in General Medical vs Women's Specialty Journals: Not Just "Navel-to-Knees"
Jocalyn P Clark, Julie M Dergal, Penelope de Nobrega, Anjali Misra, Georgina D Feldberg, Paula A Rochon (CANADA)
Abstract

Study of Peer Review

Prodding Tardy Reviewers: Randomized Comparison of Phone, Fax, and e-Mail
Leon F Burmeister, Roy M Pitkin (UNITED STATES)
Abstract  |   Article  published in JAMA. 2002;287(21):2794-2795. doi:10.1001/jama.287.21.2794.

Effect of Formal Training Session on Subsequent Performance of Journal Peer Reviewers
Michael L Callaham, David L Schriger (UNITED STATES)
Abstract  |   Article  published in Ann Emerg Med. 2002;40(3):323–328. doi:dx.doi.org/10.1067/mem.2002.127121.

Structured Training Resources for Scientific Peer Reviewers
Richelle J Cooper, Michael L Callaham, David L Schriger (UNITED STATES)
Abstract

The Quality of Reviewers of the Chinese Journal of Internal Medicine
Ding Yunqiu, Qian Shouchu (CHINA)
Abstract

Frequency and Consistency of Reviewers' Comments on a Methods Section
Erica Frank, Lucia McLendon, Donna Brogan, Dorothy Fitzmaurice (UNITED STATES)
Abstract

Reviewers and Reviews Under Scrutiny: An Assessment of Strengths and Weaknesses
Sheila Mary McNab (THE NETHERLANDS)
Abstract

Peer Reviewers' Recommendations to Publish and Ratings of Manuscript Quality for Accepted and Rejected Manuscripts
Robert McNutt, Richard M Glass (UNITED STATES)
Abstract

Attitudes Toward Open Peer Review and Electronic Transmission of Papers for Their Review
Remedios Melero, F López-Santoveña (SPAIN)
Abstract  |   Article  published in Food Sci Technol Int. 2001;7(6) 521-527. doi: 10.1106/0MXD-YM6F-3LM6-G9EB.

The Care of Peer Review: Reviewers vs Editors and Future Citation of Manuscripts
Tobias Opthof, Ruben Coronel, Jaques M T de Bakker, Jan W T Fiolet, Marcel M Levi, Martin Pfaffendorf, Marieke W Veldkamp, Arthur A M Wilde, Michiel J Janse (THE NETHERLANDS)
Abstract  |   Article  published in Cardiovasc Res. 56 (2002) 339–346. doi: dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6363(02)00712-5.

Peer Reviewers' Age and Peer Review Quality
Qian Yue, Cui Xiaolan, Li Wenhhui, Bao Yalin, Huang Yubin, Cai Lifeng, Zhao Hongmei, Wang Guizhen (CHINA)
Abstract

Referees' Opinions About Editorial Policies and Practices of an Academic Medical Journal in Brazil
Julio Cesar Voltarelli,Valderez Aparecida Coelho Falaschi, Maria De Lourdes Veronese Rodrigues (BRAZIL)
Abstract

EXHIBITORS

Aries Systems Corporation

200 Sutton Street
North Andover, MA 01845
Telephone: 978-975-7570
Fax: 978-975-3811
e-Mail: stashjian@ariessys.com
Contact person: Susan Tashjian

BMJ Publishing Group

BMA House
Tavistock Square
London WC1H 9JR
Telephone: 44-20-7383-6600
Fax: 44-20-7383-6662
e-Mail: hrobertson@bmjbooks.com
Contact person: Helen Robertson

Council of Science Editors

11250 Roger Bacon Drive, Suite 8
Reston, VA 20190
Telephone: 703-437-4377
Fax: 703-435-4390
e-mail: councilscienceeditors.org
Contact person: Kathy Hoskins

Ediciones Doyma

Travesera de Gracis 17-21
08021 Barcelona, Spain
Telephone: 34-932-000-711
Fax: 34-932-091-136
e-Mail: jjuan@doyma.es
Contact person: Joan Juan

eJournalPress

5508 Greentree Rd
Bethesda, MD 20817
Telephone 301-254-5900
Fax: 301-564-4006
e-Mail: plotkin@ejournalpress.com
Contact person: Joel Plotkin

European Association of Science Editors

PO Box 426
Guildford GB-GU4 7ZH
Telephone: 44-1483-21-1056
Fax: 44-1483-21-1056
e-Mail: secretary@ease.org.uk
Contact person: Jenny Gretton

IPC Communications, Inc

501 Colonial Drive
St Joseph, MI 49085
Telephone: 616-983-8749
Fax: 616-983-9162
e-Mail: pcatania@ipcjci.com
Contact person: Patti Catania

JAMA and Archives Journals

515 N State St
Chicago, IL 60610
Telephone: 312-464-2402
Fax: 312-464-5824
e-Mail: jamams@ama-assn.org
Contact person: Roxanne Young

PaperPath, Inc

1244 Boylston St, #200
Chestnut Hill, MA 02445
Telephone: 617-232-4900
Fax: 617-232-9704
e-Mail: jfisher@paperpath.com
Contact person: Julian Fisher

ScholarOne, Inc

1224 West Main St, Suite 275
Charlottesville, VA 22903-2858
Telephone: 804-817-2040
Fax: 804-817-2020
e-Mail: taylor.bowen@scholarone.com
Contact person: Taylor Bowen

Back to Top of Program

CONGRESS ORGANIZERS AND PLANNERS

JAMA (The Journal of the American Medical Association)

JAMA is a weekly, international, peer-reviewed, general medical journal with a circulation of 340 000 in 148 countries. In addition, 17 international editions of JAMA reach another 350 000 readers. The American Medical Association (AMA) is a partnership of physicians and their professional associations dedicated to promoting the art and science of medicine and the betterment of public health. The Publishing Group of the AMA also publishes 9 specialty journals (Archives Journals) and a number of Web sites and, with AMA Press, JAMA and Archives Journals Books. JAMA, which is editorially independent of the AMA, was founded by the AMA in 1883.

The following AMA staff contributed significantly to the planning and support of this Congress: Kathryn Carow, Cathy DeAngelis, Annette Flanagin, Helga Fritz, Terri Hanley, Sharon Kremkau, Cassio Lynm, Jim Michalski, Rosa Miranda, Jennifer Reiling, Drummond Rennie, Ronna Henry Siegel, Tom Toftey, Roxanne K. Young, Kim Westman, and Vivienne Williams.

BMJ Publishing Group

The BMJ Publishing Group, one of the world's largest and most influential medical publishers, produce a wide range of journals, medical reports, and guides, including the BMJ, specialty journals, Clinical Evidence, and 20 local editions of the BMJ that are published overseas as far afield as South Africa, India, Russia, Mexico, Poland, and Portugal. The BMJ Publishing Group is owned by the British Medical Association (BMA), a professional association of doctors and an independent trade union with a mission to promote medical and allied sciences and to maintain the honor and interests of the medical profession. The BMJ was founded in 1840 as the Provincial Medical and Surgical Journal and was adopted by BMA as its official publication, becoming the British Medical Journal a few years later. Today, it is one of the world's leading international medical journals.

The following staff of the BMJ Publishing Group contributed significantly to the planning of the Congress: Gaby Shockley, Jane Smith, and Richard Smith.

Local Arrangements Assistance

Ediciones Doyma

Ediciones Doyma is the leading Spanish biomedical publishing company with more than 80 journals. Many of them are indexed in the most important bibliographic indexes (Index Medicus, Science Citation Index, Current Contents) such as Medicina Clínica and Revista Española de Cardiología. Doyma also issues the Spanish edition of some prestigious biomedical journals such as Pediatrics, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, and JAMA. The majority of Doyma's journals are the official publications of prestigious medical societies. Doyma's main goal is to be the world's preferred creator and provider of personalized health information and services in Spanish language, across all distribution platforms and devices. Ediciones Doyma will continue to develop the most complete and precise health publishing projects.

The following staff contributed significantly to the planning of this Congress:

Mònica Barnés, Evarist Feliu, Joan Juan, and Lluís Segú.


Back to Top of Program